Copper Fox Metals Trading

After a brief run up surprise surprise. Anon does their thing and sells 100 shares to flatten the price for the day. We've watched this activity for months now and the share holders are getting really fed up with these antics. But, times are changing. The volume is increasing and anon will run out of shares and complaints are being filed with securities. Eventually they will get enough complaints and they will have to look into it. In the meantime, the volume is going up and there is a trend to higher levels.

The reason for the increased activity is that we are heading to the checkered flag and some people know it. Exactly when that is is hard to guess. How long will the BFS get batted back and forth with Teck? Since Teck already has all the data they must have their own set of numbers and they would want the BFS to agree closer with their numbers. We've been told how robust our numbers will be and this could be one reason Teck is working this over so hard.

With all the brain power we put on it I don't think our numbers can be challenged for long. Time is ticking.

Abuse of the Anonymous Privilege

posted on Nov 27, 12 03:52PM Use the IP Check tool ^[?]

seriously?

	1.08	100	TSXV	15:49:27	Close Anonymous 001	Close Anonymous 001
	1.09	1700	TSXV	15:44:38	Close National Bank Financial Inc. 5th Floor 1155 Metcalfe Street Montreal, QC H3B 4S9 (514) 879-2222 080	Close Instinet Canada Limited Canadian Pacific Tower, 100 Wellington Street West, TD Centre, Suite 2202, PO Box 134 Toronto, ON M5K 1H1 (416) 368-2211 013

Blackheath BHR.v drills big tungsten results

Are these good? Oh hell ya! This is exactly what got me thinking about these properties last year while researching HPY.v. Now that prices are strong reactivating mines like this is a no brainer especially with drill results like these. BHR.v will continue to hit good results. I can't wait to see what's under the dome where the gold is but it's probably a bit early to talk about that zone.

This is 500 cubic meters more pay dirt. Call it an average of 1.72% or $5.5 million worth of tungsten. As the shape is defined better a more accurate dollar figure can be obtained. The above rough calculation doesn't take into account that this is a continuation. It would be fair to say that in the distance spanned between holes should be counted as 1 unit.

1. CO 7/12 was collared approximately 16 metres west of historic drill hole 79-13 (7.46 metres @ 2.43% WO₃) and16 metres east of historic drill hole 77-64 (6.3 metres @ 1.65% WO₃).
2. CO 8/12A was collared approximately 25 metres west of historic drill hole 77-64 and 25.5 metres east of historic drill hole 77-69 (2.39 metres @ 0.89% WO₃ within a greater interval of 6.71 metres @ 0.41 % WO₃)

Hole ID	TD (m)	From (m)	To (m)	Intercept (m)	WO3 (%)
CO 7/12	77.90	44.57	52.55	7.98	2.11
Including		50.00	52.55	2.55	4.24
CO 8/12A	95.60	81.40	85.55	4.15	0.71
Including		81.40	83.82	2.42	1.15

By comparison from HPY.v

 ------------------------------------------------------------
 |        |        |Hole |From |To   |Interval|W03 |W03     |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |Prospect|Hole    |Angle|(m)  |(m)  |(m)     |%   |kg/tonne|
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |RC      |F11-07  |-55  |14.3 |19.0 |4.7     |1.02|10.0    |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |RC      |F12-07  |-90  |13.0 |16.0 |3.0     |1.18|11.8    |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |RC      |F12-09  |-90  |15.0 |26.0 |11.0    |0.80|8.0     |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |RC      |F12-10  |-55  |17.0 |19.0 |8.0     |0.46|4.6     |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |BN      |F12-26  |-48  |3.0  |6.0  |3.0     |1.93|19.3    |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |BN      |F12-27  |-80  |1.9  |6.0  |4.10    |1.78|17.8    |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |BN      |F12-27  |-80  |83.2 |98.0 |14.8    |4.04|40.4  |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |BN      |includes|-80  |138.0|143.8|5.8     |2.01|20.1    |
 |----------------------------------------------------------|
 |BN      |F12-28  |-90  |83.1 |86.0 |2.9     |1.20|12.0    |
 ------------------------------------------------------------

It's pretty clear that these two picks are the top rated tungsten guys. There's not likely going to be any rivals for share space. Unlike graphite where there was a lot of buzz and a shake out (see The Merc Geo) there just are not that many deposits to examine.